Tag Archives: DTCV 101

Social Media and Social Change

@MyDtcAccount – Jonathan Crabtree

 

“The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.” This quote, accredited to Aristotle, is an indication of how powerful people can be when they come together, and how long it has been this way. Since before the time of Aristotle, people have been congregating in order to achieve a goal that would be too difficult to reach by themselves. Social media has given society an easier way than ever before of getting people with like-minded ideals and goals together. One of the ways that people are drawn to others is through the use of stories. The neurological process of hearing stories causes people to remember the idea that was communicated in the story longer than when they are simply told an idea or goal. Deanna Zandt states that “social networking gives us unprecedented power to share our stories with more people than we ever imagined” (1). This “unprecedented power” has organized protests, rebellions, and weekend get-aways to the beach, with more ease than ever before. Gone are the days of having to go around areas and posting physical material and hoping to get the populations’ attention, or relying on word of mouth to spread the date of an event. Individuals are now able to directly contact people and open up message boards so that everyone interested in the event is able to get on the same page and there’s no confusion.

Zandt presents six key terms (originally presented by Tara Hunt) that increase an individual’s value within a social media environment – although I would posit that they are all transferable to real-life value. The main one that social media immediatly improves is the term “connections.” By being a part of a social media environment, people are connected with others, which can lead to a discussion of ideas and eventually bloom into a full-blown event that seeks to create social change.

Blog Post #4

@JaredAbrahamWSU

 

In the two examples of ABC World News and the Oprah Winfrey CNN clips there were many differences. To me the biggest, and most obvious, difference was the picture quality. In the ABC clip the video appeared to be shot on some kind of low resolution film. In the Oprah Winfrey clip it looked like CNN was using digital Hi-definition cameras. Another large difference between the two was the narration. In the Peter Jennings ABC World News clip the narration was more monotone than the reporting. At one point reminding me of the old Walt Disney clips that would be showing off the plans for Disneyland. The ABC World News clip also seemed less biased, they were just telling you what was happening, instead of giving their opinion on the subject. In the CNN Oprah Winfrey clip, it seemed like there was a lot of confrontation between the news contributors,  which ABC didn’t even have in their clip. Both channels had some B-roll clips they played while the narration and debating were going on, the only difference was the Oprah Winfrey clip didn’t really have a story in the video. Whereas the ABC World News Clip relied heavily on the video to convey the story they were trying to tell. As far as New Media being “offered as an improvement” (Bolton and Grusin, pg. 79), I think the argument could go both ways. The technology is better by far in the newer clip, but I much prefer the unbiased story telling in the older clip.