An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge

When comparing the short film version of An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge to the written short story I noticed a few differences. The main difference I noticed has to do with the backstory. In the written version of the story, there was an entire section dedicated to providing background about his life/who he is, and why he is being hanged. However, in the short film version of the story, we aren’t directly told anything about him or why is about to be hanged. At the beginning of the story, we are briefly shown a poster explaining why someone would be hanged. We are then able to connect this poster to the reason he is in the situation he is in. As for his background, we are able to infer things about him from his appearance, like the fact that he is a wealthy man.

As for the film techniques that successfully translated the effects in the short story, I think that pacing was a big one. At the begging of the film when Peyton is being set up to be hanged, it is moving very slowly and we are able to feel the built-up anticipation of his hanging that he must have been feeling as well. In addition, I think that the scene where he was falling into the water was shot and edited in a way that elevated the story. Prior to that scene, we were feeling the same anticipation he was feeling and then we were able to be immersed in the scene with him by seeing what it looked like from his perspective.

Cinema Language

The most obvious difference regarding “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” between both mediums is the implementation of film techniques to imply emotions and story beats that are otherwise explicitly stated in its prose counterpart- Words are transferable to film, but employing its visual language is mutually exclusive to movies. 

The explicit exploration of Peyton’s life is absent in the film, as well as a lot of instances in which emotion is transcribed to the reader. The prose invokes words like “impatience” and “apprehension” as he awaits his fate. The episode uses slow, deliberate camera movements to manufacture a sense of foreboding, and uses cuts to contextualize the point of view of Peyton- his nervous glances and sweat-slicked face and the cuts to the environment are more than enough to get a sense of his thought process. 

The most impressive bit of filmmaking- and divergence from the source- comes at the conclusion, where the locked-down camera and surreal, suddenly synthetically manicured trees foreshadow what’s about to happen. The use of cuts as Peyton reunites with his wife dilate time in a way that written word is incapable of; The two are maneuvering through the same space repeatedly, making their collision seem almost asymptotical, like a lifetime of anticipation and memory building and then flickering out. It’s an effective translation of the story. 

The match cut is a classic cinematic tool, and employed effectively here to translate the gut punch of the final sentence. The sudden head turn and neck snap create a visual synchrony and visual coherence to the prose of the story. 

An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge

I believe the film adaptation of An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge remained fairly true to the original story. The biggest change from story to film that I noticed was the lack of dialogue from Peyton. In the short story, we got a deeper look into the inner world of our main character. We also got a lot more backstory for the entire plot. The film shortens it to a poster in the first few seconds. It serves its purpose for providing context, but it leaves out the scene with the soldier on his horse at Peyton’s house. I think the director choosing to leave out this scene was a fine choice, but I would have liked to know more about the main character. While watching the film, he just seemed like some guy. I didn’t feel any real connection to him as a character, though I did feel sympathetic to his circumstances (that is, until I read more about his beliefs).

I think the ticking of the pocket watch translated well from story to film. It added a feeling of panic, and the speeding up of the ticking while it got louder, while the very slow and steady shot of his wife lingered, felt suffocating.

I also think the little details of what he saw translated very well into film and were supported by the song choice during the river scene.

 

Overall, I did enjoy both versions of this story! I think I liked the story more though.

Short Films Response (Late)

All of the films have a sense of on-going-ness to them. They don’t happen in any specific time frame, but occur across a long period of time. We are given a sense that the story continues even beyond what we as viewers are shown, and that there was likely some story that occurred before the start of the films that we never get to see. The conflict is with more daily-life issues that are not a one off occurrence: mental illness, the loss of innocence, a limited worldview, an absent parent. These stories hold our attention because they call to some deeper part of ourselves who recognize these strife that often affect us in our real life. They are linear, but unpredictable, just like time and life itself. The two films I’ve chosen to look at more closely are ‘Meshes of the Afternoon’ and ‘160 Characters’, which both show off this snapshot realism, because those are the two that I felt I connected with on a deeper level. 

‘Meshes of the Afternoon’, to me, shows a woman struggling with her mental illness. As I was watching the film, I saw the recurring flower as a symbol of life or the will to keep living; the figure in all black was her ‘monster’, which wore a mirror of her face because she is her own inner demon. The house was representative of the darker sides of her own mind, where she is constantly battling with noise and unstable ground and nonsensical chaos. Her hesitancy to enter, shown by her knocking and the slow opening of the door, is her trying to reject her darker thoughts, but inevitably she always returns again, no matter how many times she chases that dark figure down in an attempt to regain her will to live. This could also explain why the house is so plain in design, as those with extreme mental illness are known to lack observation skills, often missing smaller details of the world around them; and the phone that is off of its hook is symbolic of her either giving up on or feeling as if she cannot call for help. To me, the key to the house felt like an indicator of self-harm, as seen by the way it turns into the knife on and off, and by the fact that it always is the thing that lets her into this house of instability. I have a feeling that the record, which plays a somber tune, is reminiscent of the loud, negative thoughts in her head. When we are introduced to the man that seems to be her partner, it feels as though he has walked (confidently, I might add, no knocking at the door) into this space of her darker thoughts, bringing the life flower with him in an attempt to help her settle down with it. Her attacking him seems like it might be indicative of a scene where she lashes out at him as he tries to help her come to some level of peace with her own illness, and yet we do see him come back again. I believe that the image of the broken mirror is showing us that she eventually attacked her ‘monster’ and took her own life. The man comes to her one day and finds the life-flower on the ground outside, and goes in to find her dead in the house, having succumbed to the chaos and violence of her own mind. What we do not get to see, though, is his reaction, and what ensues after. This would likely be an entirely separate story of its own. 

‘160 characters’ didn’t mean as much to me in terms of symbolism, as ‘Meshes in the Afternoon’ did, but rather it was a story of sad reality and emotion. As somebody who has a strained relationship with her own father and has seen her mother struggle with trying to get him to be active in her children’s lives, I felt the emotional impact of this film personally. Telling a story through text messages seems to be the producer’s way of adding an extra layer of distance between the characters– we see the mother and her child together several times throughout the film, but never once the father. He doesn’t have a face in this story, really driving home his absence in his son’s life. Due to his neglect as a parent, the narrator– the boy’s mother– likely struggled financially, relying on the help of friends and family. The few shots we have of the apartment they lived in indicate that it was simply a cheap place to live. This is especially driven home by the shot of the balcony, where we hear sirens echoing outside, possibly indicating that they are in a bad part of town. We also know that her son does not get his first mobile phone until he is well into his teens, which may be another nod to their more meager means of living. The man’s absence and sporadic involvement is very likely going to have an effect on Jim in the future as well, as he wonders who his father is (which his mother is preparing for) and why he didn’t stick around. 

An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge

When comparing the movie to the short story, a chunk about how the man, Peyton Farquhar, encountered a Federal scout that alludes to the reason why he is being hanged is completely removed and left at the audience discretion on how he ended up in his position. I think this decision to remove this part of the story in the film helps the following scenes to be more real and trick the audience into thinking Peyton did manage to escape. It is unnecessary information to take the time to tell it all when the audience can connect to the character and project their thoughts to the character. 

During the part when Peyton fell into the water and the Federal army began to shoot at him, everything slowed down to the audio and movements. I believe this helps translate the feeling of someone who just escaped death and now has to come up with a decision on what to do. It reminds me of quick time events in games where the character may be falling or doing something in slow motion and the player has to hit a button. It drives a feeling of urgency for the next move that can potentially save your life. The close ups and the composition of the man always at the center of the frame makes me feel motivated that he will actually make it to his family. While watching this movie, I was constantly on the edge that something may come and hinder the man and kill him after his journey thus far. Shots are framed and choreographed in a way that made me anticipate a federal guard will come and stab him. The constant flipping angles between the man and the wife really did drive home the hopeful feeling I had that he did manage to escape. Unfortunately, it was taken away when the final sequence showed that it was all the man’s wishful thinking and he died as he was intended to.

Overall, it’s a great short film that goes through a lot of emotions and raises hope only to crush them at the end.