Author Archives: 0alloldusers

Authoring Project 2

Final

Bibliography

Smartphones and Social Networks Digitally Dividing the Young

Authoring Project #2

digitaldivide1

digitaldivideWORK CITED

DigitalDividepowerpoint1

 

Authoring project

Digital Divide PPT

Digital Divide DOC

the four commands, commandments?

Rushkoff’s last four chapters are social, fact, openness, and purpose.  Rushkoff argues in the social chapter that the contact is important, not the content.  We use social media to reach out others not to be categorized and marketed to.  If that happens the message is lost.  When Rushkoff spoke at our school he made an interesting point about how Facebook is cookie cutter.  That no longer are we there to share and make new connections, but rather to represent some shell of who we are.  In the eighth chapter Rushkoff says how fact will win against fiction, in digital technology.  While he is right that we must tell the truth, people will believe what they want to.  The Internet can make any quack, or conspiracy theorist feel right, if not righteous.  The openness of the net allows for all opinions which is good yet so often poisonous.  Yet Rushkoff is right we must be open, and share not steal.  If we wish to create new things we must share, but sometimes the line between sharing and stealing get blurred.  For instance, if I make a mash up video showing the stupidity of CNN, Time Warner could sue me.  Yet if they were smart the would see their network is ripe for satire.  Satire is under the fair use clause but this would not necessarily be allowed.  In Rushkoff’s final chapter purpose(programed or be programed).  He says “If we don’t learn to program, we risk being programed ourselves.”  This means we must learn code, and understand the inner workings of computer, lest we become ignorant and complacent of the technology that surrounds us.  If we are not careful we will be rewired instead of the computer.

Last Commands

@TannerSturza

Douglas Rushkoff’s last four commands are social, fact, openness, and program or be programed. The seventh command, social, claims that without a computer you are left out of social networks and will have difficulty connecting with people and being social because social networks are becoming a main source of communication. The eight command is fact and it claims that true facts spread around the internet more than false ones. When something is posted on the internet it is seen by so many people that it will be made clear if it is true or false faster than it would be if it was told to you by another person. The ninth command is openness, files and documents can be shared on the internet and that sharing is different from stealing. People without computers don’t know the difference between sharing and stealing something on the internet. The tenth and final command is program or be programmed. This command says that those who don’t have or use computers are controlled by people with computers because they are influenced by people who use the internet rather than contributing and being apart of digital technology and the internet.

Rushkoff’s Commands

@ObergJustin

For someone living in the modern world in the digital divide, where access to a computer is difficult, Rushkoff’s commands would have a very different affect on them than those with digital access. Those in the digital divide might not be affected as much as someone who is constantly interacting with digital media, but they also have no control to program or make a change in the digital world. For instance, in Rushkoff’s first command he states, “digital networks are biased toward social connections-toward contact” (Rushkoff 91). Now someone who does not participate on the digital network will not have to experience all of the seemingly meaningless social contacts that go on online in the form of messaging or spreading memes. However, many times what is created on a digital network leaps to the actual world such as political ideas that stir revolution. In these cases those with digital access are actually changing the world and those without have no opportunity to add their voice to the conversation. When it comes to facts, those in the digital divide are never influenced by the overabundance of false information that floats around online, but they also miss out the access to all of the relevant true information as well. “Digital networks were built for the purpose of sharing resources, technologies, and credit on order to create it.” (Rushkoff 118) Someone could be very talented at something and want to share it with the world but still live in the digital divide. They are at a severe disadvantage because more and more people are choosing to spend their free time looking and buying stuff on digital networks as opposed to the real world. Finally Rushkoff make the point that “we must learn how to make the software, or risk becoming the software” (Rushkoff 134). Even though someone might not be on a digital network, they can still be programmed by it just from the amount of change to our culture computers have caused in the last few decades. However, those in the divide have absolutely no way of learning how to make the software and thus can never program and will always be those who are programmed.

locative art- too broad a word or too narrow?

Locative art is a word that seems to be interpreted differently by the different search engines.  Wikipedia interpreted to mean location media, which brought up an interesting idea of using GIS as form art/activism.  I have never thought of GIS in artistic sense certainly in a activist sense, but never artistic.  Yet since some of the best art is statement, and can therefore be interpreted as activism, I guess it’s not that far of a leap.  Wikipedia is problematic though because it can be edited by anyone, yet they still provide an easy understandable answer to almost any question.  Worldcat just brought up a bunch of books on art in general, which is what I expect with that terrible search engine.  It’s very difficult to find something you specifically want with that search engine.  Yet if I wanted a book on art, I would use this site.  Leonardo Electronic Almanac offered descriptions on specific artists.  It brought up specific artist using the concept of space and technology and the how they interact.  This site is good for learning about current artists, and how they are blending different mediums in a artistic sense.  I even found one of my teachers in the magazine.  I think if I were to modify the search I would find more specific results.  Locative Art seems not to generate many results.

@ColleenBurke85

Locative Art

@ObergJustin

After searching the term “locative art” I discovered there were many differences between the different search sites. Each search site was different in its credibility and usefulness. Searching the term locative art on Wikipedia gave me a very quick, down and dirty definition of what locative media is in general. Now where Wikipedia is the least credible of the sources because it can be easily edited by anyone, it does seem to be a good launching off point because the page gives you a general definition that you can wrap your mind around and provides many links to more reputable sources on the subject. Searching the Leonardo Electronic Almanac was interesting. The LEA seems credible since it is the collaborative effort of many universities including MIT and centers around art, science and technology. However, the information it provides was a little cluttered for my taste and was definitely not as easy to find as on Wikipedia. It took me awhile to find an article dealing specifically with locative art and even longer to find a definition on the term. The same was with World Cat, which even though it is a trusted credible source of articles run by WSU, it took significantly longer to find a relevant article and a definition specifically about locative art. This trade off of ease of access and credibility seems to be the norm online. If you want to find an article that is both useful and credible, be prepared to spend time digging through trusted yet non-optimized databases of articles.

Researching

@TannerSturza

When searching locative art in Wikipedia you get a page with a lot of information on it, but no way of knowing if any of it is misinformation as mentioned in the document Evaluating Information Found on the Internet, “it isn’t deliberate, it’s just wrong or mistaken.” Wikipedia can be used as a start for gathering information and search ideas, but nothing on wikipedia is credible and would need to be found on a credible site. Leonardo Electronic Almanac gave me a list of articles that were credible and useful, but it only gave me a few pages of articles. WorldCat was the most useful search engine because of the options that it gave me to narrow down my search results and all the results were credible. Both WorldCat and Leonardo Electronic Almanac give you information about the author to make the articles more credible. When researching on the web I must use search engines or databases like WorldCat and Leonardo Electronic Almanac if I want the information I find to be credible and correct. If I am starting to research a topic that I’m not familiar with I can use Wikipedia to get me started with broad information that I can search for in databases with credible articles.

out of sight out of mind

I when I was younger I used to turn off my phone, and leave the house sometimes I would merely drive around for hours, (this is when gas was much cheaper) other times I would simply walk around in the city as a way to get lost in the surroundings.  I like to be invisible, turning my phone was a way to be invisible from family and friends.  This exercise was not that difficult for me since it’s natural inclination to disconnect and be incognito.  I couldn’t do it for the whole day since, my family and particularly my boyfriend would be worried, though not too much since again I have done this in the past.  I hate how connected yet disconnected we have become.  Rushkoff talks in his book about a girl who is considered the most social girl in school, she is always going out trying to find the hippest party communicates with thousands on facebook and everyone listens to her.  Yet her phone is a constant barrier, face to face communication seems much more difficult for her.  When I was walking around Portland on my technology free day I saw two guys, who looked to be friends, they weren’t even communicating to each other they were both engrossed in their phones.  I made a remark to them on how odd it looked to me, and they said they were tourists.  This poses an interesting point, our smart phones help us navigate a foreign city and allow us to see different attractions in a more efficient manner.  We can go to this famous coffee shop, we can see that famous monument, but that takes away one of the greatest joys of traveling.  Exploring for the sake of exploring.  Simply walking around without any preconceived notion on what you want to see, this allows for pleasant and not so pleasant surprises.  If we no longer discover things on our own, then I feel we have lost part of human experience.

@ColleenBurke85